Critics say net-zero target has been imposed by ‘elites’ without electoral mandate
A large proportion of the British public are in favour of a referendum on the government’s net-zero proposals, according to a new poll by YouGov.
Some 42% of adults said they supported a vote on the plan, while 30% opposed it, and 28% did not declare a preference. The Telegraph noted that when the “don’t knows” were excluded from the results, a majority of 58% wanted a public vote on the issue.
A ‘new religion’
The government’s Energy White Paper details the Government’s long-term vision for achieving its net-zero target by 2050, including an increased movement towards renewable electricity such as offshore wind and greater use of green technology.
Among other strategies, the paper calls for net-zero-carbon buildings, energy efficiency, and motorists replacing cars with electric vehicles.
However, some argue it does not have a democratic mandate.
Writing for The Telegraph, Allister Heath said a referendum is essential because “the political elite is imposing a revolution,” while treating voters like “naughty children” and “apathetic imbeciles”.
He said the “vast majority, at least in wealthy nations, wants to improve the environment, reduce pollution, bolster biodiversity, treat animals better and prevent man-made catastrophes”.
However, he argued, “that is where the near-universal consensus ends” because “the details of how to proceed are explosively contentious, and require democratic assent to be legitimate”.
He concluded that “the green challenge is too important, its implications too dramatic, to be left to an establishment that has embraced net zero as if it were a new religion”.
Earlier this year, Swiss voters rejected a proposed new climate law in a referendum by 52% to 48%, leading to calls for a similar poll here. At the time, Swiss environment minister Simonetta Sommaruga said that the defeat would make it “very difficult” for Switzerland to reach the goal of net zero emissions by 2050.
The new YouGov survey was commissioned by CAR26.org, a controversial new campaign group which claims that “there is serious doubt that CO2 has a significant negative impact on the climate”.
‘Action not talk’
Joseph Lewis, of the Institution of Environmental Sciences, said the suggestion of a referendum on the issue is a “sad” reflection on the UK.
Speaking to GB News, he said there are “better ways” to “have the conversation” on climate change than a “yes or no” ballot, and said that conversation must move beyond “if we should do things” to address climate change, to “how we do those things”.
Only then, he added, can we “resolve real concerns about the way in which we do it, and whether measures are right or not”. He concluded that we need “less talk and more good action”.
The Tony Blair Institute’s Tim Lord rejected the idea that “elites” are behind the drive for climate action. He said “there is irony in this – as it is the poorest who will be most severely affected by unconstrained climate change”.
Lord agreed that the net-zero target was introduced in the summer of 2019 with minimal debate in the Commons and no mention of the plan in the 2017 election – but it was included in the Conservative manifesto ahead of the December 2019 election.
While delivering net zero is a “complex task” that “cannot be achieved without public support for both the overall goal, and the policies required to get there”, this “cannot mean everyone supports every measure”, he said. Consent must be drawn from a broad base and “net zero has to be based around a politics of unity, not division”.
The Week, 27 October 2021