Skip to content

In 1992 Rush Limbaugh Predicted Today’s Militant New Socialists Dressed in Green

Tyler O'Neil, PJ Media

Decades before “democratic socialist” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) released her Green New Deal, rallying Democrats to the banner of remaking America in the name of fighting climate change, radio behemoth Rush Limbaugh warned that environmentalist activists are socialists in green clothing. His warning back in 1992 has been powerfully confirmed in recent months.

Image result for AOC green new deal GWPF

“The militant environmental movement is the home of the new socialists in America, and they’re after the punishment of America. America’s responsible for all this,” Limbaugh told PBS’s Charlie Rose in 1992.

When Rose asked, “They’re out to socialize America?” Limbaugh replied, “Damn right.”

“Here’s how. Here’s how. Here’s how, Charlie. To socialize America, the first thing you do is you say, ‘America’s responsible for the destruction of the planet. It’s American lifestyles, hair spray. It’s smokestacks,'” the radio host explained.

Rose dodged, asking if Limbaugh was denying that there is any pollution that could impact the environment.

“I am saying that the vanity of humanity is amazing to me,” the conservative radio host responded. “I do not believe that we have the ability to destroy this marvelous creation. We can damage it.”

“But we make a mess by existing, and we’re the ones who can fix it. And you need freedom, you need democracy, you need technological advancement. You don’t need rolling back of progress in order to fix these things, and that’s what these people want to do,” Limbaugh explained.

Rush Limbaugh has been remarkably consistent, and he was right on in 1992 just as he is today.

In fact, AOC’s chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, recently admitted that the Green New Deal “wasn’t originally a climate thing at all.” He explained, “Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.”

Presidential candidates like Bernie Sanders have called for a “revolution” to upend the current economic system. They justify this by pointing to inequality and — Rush guessed it — climate change. The old threats of identity politics and climate alarmism are very much alive today.

Full post