The IPCC claims to be saving the planet. Many journalists believe the planet needs saving. In a profound betrayal of the public’s trust, some news outlets don’t report stories that make the saviours look bad.
SPOTLIGHT: Why doesn’t the public know about these 3-year-old allegations?
BIG PICTURE: Rajendra Pachauri resigned in disgrace in February 2015 after chairing the world’s most important climate body for 13 years. An employee of an institute he ran in India told police he’d persistently groped and forcibly kissed her. She had, she said, lost her job after refusing to sit beside him on a plane. Soon afterward, other women stepped forward with similar stories.
Pachauri was a big fish. Frequently described as the world’s top climate scientist, he stood on a podium beside Al Gore when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Gore were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The fact that he was accused of multiple offenses under the Indian Penal Code and faced maximum prison sentences of three to seven years should have been front page news.
Canada’s publicly-funded CBC website reported Pachauri’s official remarks in March, April, and November of 2014. But there’s no mention whatsoever of his resignation a few months later – or of his ongoing legal battles since then. It’s as though these women’s allegations don’t exist.
Extensively interviewed on Australia’s publicly-funded ABC radio and television programs, and quoted at length in its news articles, Pachauri was similarly considered newsworthy by the ABC in March, April, September, November and December of 2014. Since then: a total blackout. Not one reference to his resignation the following February – or of the harm he allegedly inflicted on numerous young female employees.